.foXinternet

Wednesday, May 04, 2005 :

Election III

…having said that, Michael Howard was quite good on BBC Breakfast this morning.

Last night on Newsnight they ran a feature where Salam Pax (the Baghdad Blogger) went around Bethnal Green and Bow talking to the candidates and the locals. This has reconfirmed my view that Oona King is the only option.

I somehow get the feeling that I am not regarded by many of the parties as being within one of the important target demographic sectors in my constituancy. Interestingly, the only party which has been bothered to canvass at my door has been Respect. “In touch with the concerns of the people” points deducted for calling during the Liverpool — Chelsea match. Respect was always going to be on a sticky wicket anyway, canvassing inside an apartment block where the cheapest one–bedroom apartment must be worth at least £250k on the basis that “we’re the party that stands for what the Labour Party used to stand for” — i.e. royally screwing anyone in receipt of an income sufficient to service the mortgage concomitant with owner–occupancy in such an apartment block.

Isn’t it funny how Labour are now the obvious choice for the conservative voter? Isn’t it funny that earning enough to buy a lousy one–bedroom flat in central London means that you are in serious danger of being among “the rich” in the Founding Declaration commitment: “Tax the rich to fund welfare and to close the growing gap between the poor and the wealthy few”.



Comments:
Socialism my arse. I'd give the scrounging fuggers what for. No representation without taxation.

I didn't fight in two World Wars to see this country go to .....
 
You may take this piss, Colonel, but in a democracy, why shouldn't I vote in line with what I see as my reasonable self-interest, with the intention of getting someone who represents me into Parliament?

Then, it should all come out in the democratic process. If there aren't enough people who share my interest, unlucky, that's democracy, I'll have to put up with whoever gets elected.

But why would I vote for a party which has expressly stated that it is there to represent "the working class, the poor, the immigrants, the pensioners, the students...", none of which are categories into which I fall and the representation of all of which (the suggestion is) will be advanced by greater tax contributions from people like me (i.e. people who work hard, are certainly not loaded in kind of trust funds/fancy car/big house/dinners at the Gavroche sense and who already pay 3 days' pay out of 5 in tax).
 
it looks like you've been royally screwed
 
Well, not really, because the Respect party does not get to form the government. But I have certainly been reminded that that twats like me represent a seriously threatened minority in my 'hood. Diversity my arse. I'm moving to the Home Counties (oh bollocks, can't afford it...).
 
Post a Comment

« Home

want more?
Any views expressed here are, at best, those of the author and are not necessarily shared by the author’s employer.

Home
Archives
Mail Me
RSS

Emailsafe
Mail Hughesie
Spamusement

Poetry

Newness Dance
5K2002 Entry

AA Route Planner
A List Apart
Dictionary
Gmail
HTML Keyboard
iStockphoto
Weather
Webmonkey
Yahoomail

Grammalogue
JamonInternet
Tumblage
Virtual Traveller

Into You
Living Image
Lucky Fish
Steve Herring
Sunset Strip

L.A Times
London Times
New York Times

Toggle Blogroll


originalwork
new style